University teachers data literacy for pedagogical decision making

Authors

  • Aleksandra Batuchina PhD in Education, senior researcher at the Education Department, Klaipeda University
  • Julija Melnikova PhD in Education, senior researcher at the Education Department, Klaipeda University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61007/QdC.2023.3.149

Keywords:

Learning analytics, teachers' data literacy, systemic literature analysis

Abstract

The article has specifically sought to discuss university teachers’ data literacy skills that are important for the effective use of learning analytics in the teaching-learning process. Therefore, based on this analysis, teachers must achieve a certain level of data literacy to perform certain pedagogical actions. The main question of the current research is what data literacy skills teachers need to use learning analytics tools and make data-based pedagogical decisions. The article is based on the method of systemic literature analysis. The selected and analysed research papers allow us to present big data in education, highlight the pedagogical value of learning analytics technologies, and provide an overview of learning analytic tools. The results of the theoretical study showed that to use learning analytics tools, it is important for teachers to have skills such as digital literacy, data collection, data analysis and interpretation, etc.

Author Biographies

Aleksandra Batuchina, PhD in Education, senior researcher at the Education Department, Klaipeda University

Aleksandra Batuchina, Post-doc at the Department of Pedagogy (Klaipėda University, Lithuania), Certified Associate Professional Coach (ICF), lecturer. Fields of interest: digital education; meaningful work; coaching and the impact of coaching; qualitative methodology; phenomenological methodology (Max van Manen).

Julija Melnikova, PhD in Education, senior researcher at the Education Department, Klaipeda University

Julija Melnikova, Senior Researcher at the Department of Pedagogy, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Klaipeda University.

Fields of interest: Education Leadership and Management, Digitalisation of Education.

References

Atkinson, L. Z., & Cipriani, A. (2018). How to carry out a literature search for a systematic review: a practical guide. BJPsych Advances, 24(2), 74-82.

Baker, R. S., & Hawn, A. (2021). Algorithmic bias in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1-41.

Bennett, R. E. (2015). The changing nature of educational assessment. Review of Research in Education, 39(1), 370-407.

Capogna, S. Sociology between big data and research frontiers, a challenge for educational policies and skills. Qual Quant 57, 193– 212 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01351-7.

Corrin, L., Kennedy, G., & Mulder, R. (2013). Enhancing learning analytics by understanding the needs of teachers. In ASCILITE-Australian society for computers in learning in tertiary education annual conference Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, 201-205.

Digital Education Action Plan, 2021 – 2027 (2020). Available: https://education.ec.europa.eu/focus-topics/digital-education/action-plan.

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415.

Gummer, E. S., & Mandinach, E. B. (2015). Building a conceptual framework for data literacy. Teachers College Record, 117(4), 1-22.

Haddaway, N. R., Collins, A. M., Coughlin, D., & Kirk, S. (2015). The role of Google Scholar in evidence reviews and its applicability to grey literature searching. PloS one, 10(9), e0138237.

Henderson, J., & Corry, M. (2021). Data literacy training and use for educational professionals. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 14(2), 232-244.

Herodotou, C., Rienties, B., Boroowa, A., Zdrahal, Z., & Hlosta, M. (2019). A large-scale implementation of predictive learning analytics in higher education: The teachers’ role and perspective. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67, 1273-1306.

Ifenthaler, D., Gibson, D., Prasse, D., Shimada, A., & Yamada, M. (2021). Putting learning back into learning analytics: Actions for policymakers, researchers, and practitioners. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69, 2131-2150.

Khine, M., Dhabi, A., & Emirates, U. A. (2018). Learning Analytics for Student Success: Future of Education in Digital Era. In The European Conference on Education.

Köse, U., & Özdemir, S. (2023). Teachers’ data literacy for learning analytics: a central predictor for digital data use in upper secondary schools. Education and Information Technologies, 28(3), 1685-1703. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-10722-6.

Kovanovic, V., Mazziotti, C., & Lodge, J. (2021). Learning analytics for primary and secondary schools. Journal of Learning Analytics, 8(2), 1-5.

Mangaroska, K., Vesin, B., & Giannakos, M. (2019, March). Cross- platform analytics: A step towards personalization and adaptation in education. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (pp. 71-75).

Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2014). Lernen mit Big Data: Die Zukunft der Bildung. Redline Wirtschaft.

McNaughton, S., Lai, M. K., & Hsiao, S. (2012). Testing the effectiveness of an intervention model based on data use: A replication series across clusters of schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(2), 203-228.

Michos, K., & Petko, D. (2022). Examining pedagogical data literacy: Results of a survey among school teachers at upper secondary level in Switzerland.

Poortman, C. L., & Schildkamp, K. (2016). Solving student achievement problems with a data use intervention for teachers. Teaching and teacher education, 60, 425-433.

Reeves, T. D., & Honig, S. L. (2015). A classroom data literacy intervention for pre-service teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 50, 90-101.

Rienties, B., Herodotou, C., Olney, T., Schencks, M., & Boroowa, A. (2018). Making sense of learning analytics dashboards: A technology acceptance perspective of 95 teachers. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(5).

Sergis, S., Sampson, D. G., & Pelliccione, L. (2020). Teaching analytics, value and tools for teacher data literacy: a systematic and tripartite approach. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1-23. doi: 10.1186/s41239-020-00201-6.

Siemens, G., & Long, P. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. EDUCAUSE review, 46(5), 30.

Torres, R. (2021). Does test-based school accountability have an impact on student achievement and equity in education?: A panel approach using PISA.

Van Geel, M., Keuning, T., Visscher, A. J., & Fox, J. P. (2016). Assessing the effects of a school-wide data-based decision-making intervention on student achievement growth in primary schools. American Educational Research Journal, 53(2), 360-394.

van Leeuwen, A., Knoop-van Campen, C. A., Molenaar, I., & Rummel, N. (2021). How teacher characteristics relate to how teachers use dashboards: Results from two case studies in K-12. Journal of Learning Analytics, 8(2), 6-21.

van Leeuwen, A., Knoop-van Campen, C. A., Molenaar, I., & Rummel, N. (2021). How teacher characteristics relate to how teachers use dashboards: Results from two case studies in K-12. Journal of Learning Analytics, 8(2), 6-21.

West, D., Heath, D., & Huijser, H. (2016). Let’s Talk Learning Analytics: A Framework for Implementation in Relation to Student Retention. Online Learning, 20(2), 30-50.

Zhu, C., & Urhahne, D. (2018). The use of learner response systems in the classroom enhances teachers’ judgment accuracy. Learning and Instruction, 58, 255-262.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-28

How to Cite

Batuchina, A., & Melnikova, J. (2024). University teachers data literacy for pedagogical decision making. Community Notebook. People, Education and Welfare in the Society 5.0, (3), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.61007/QdC.2023.3.149