Il mutevole paradigma dell'“Onlife Learning” negli istituti di istruzione superiore europei: Un caso di buone pratiche per lo sviluppo delle competenze nella vita lavorativa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61007/QdC.2023.3.156Parole chiave:
Trasformazione digitale, Onlife learning, Digitalizzazione dell’istruzione superiore, Sviluppo delle competenze digitali, Tecnologia nell’istruzione, Pedagogia digitaleAbstract
Le trasformazioni digitali portano opportunità e sfide nelle società moderne, con un impatto particolarmente profondo sugli istituti di istruzione superiore europei (IIS). Le tecnologie digitali e l’apprendimento online stanno diventando sempre più comuni dopo il recente fenomeno COVID-19. La continua adozione delle tecnologie digitali nelle vite umane ha determinato l’emergere di un nuovo approccio all’apprendimento chiamato “onlife learning”. L’apprendimento onlife pone l’accento sull’integrazione dell’apprendimento formale e informale, sull’uso della tecnologia per l’apprendimento continuo e sulla necessità di nuove abilità e competenze. Nell’istruzione superiore, l’onlife learning sta diventando sempre più diffuso, tuttavia non esiste un approccio unico alla formazione e allo sviluppo delle competenze. Le competenze chiave richieste per l’apprendimento onlife includono l’alfabetizzazione digitale, il pensiero critico e l’apprendimento autonomo. Queste competenze possono essere sviluppate attraverso una varietà di approcci, tra cui l’apprendimento esperienziale, l’apprendimento misto, la risoluzione di problemi e l’apprendimento online. Le tecnologie svolgono un ruolo importante nell’apprendimento onlife. È essenziale sostenere gli studenti nello sviluppo delle loro competenze digitali. Ciò include la fornitura di un accesso e di una formazione all’uso delle tecnologie appropriate, e soprattutto la creazione di opportunità per gli studenti di mettere in pratica le loro competenze digitali.
Il paper fornisce indicazioni preziose sulle migliori pratiche per la formazione e lo sviluppo delle competenze nell’onlife learning negli IIS europei. I risultati sono il frutto del progetto di Innovazione Europea ECOLHE e possono essere utilizzati per progettare una formazione efficace per la vita lavorativa, e per lo sviluppo di abilità e competenze che supportino gli studenti nello sviluppo delle competenze necessarie per avere successo in un mondo digitale in rapida evoluzione.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 80-97.
Anderson, V. (2020). A digital pedagogy pivot: re-thinking higher education practice from an HRD perspective. Human Resource Development International, 23(4), 452–467.
Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18(3), 19–31.
Bates, A. W. (2015). Teaching in a digital age. BCcampus.
Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policymakers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7(2), 161–186.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.
Capogna, S., Cocozza, A., Cecchini, G., De Angelis, M. C., De Gennaro, G., Poggi, B. D., & Proietti, E. (2021). Digital Technologies in Higher Education: Bridging the European Vision to University Governance within the European Framework. Journal of Educational Technology and Higher Education Management, 14(2), 76–89: https://ecolhe.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/IO1.A1_ECOLHE.pdf (Last consultation: November, 30th 2023).
CEN European Committee for Standardization EN 16234-1:2021; e-Competence Framework (e-CF)—A common European Framework for ICT Professionals in all sectors—Part 1: Framework 2021. CEN/CENELEC: Brussels, Belgium, 2021.
Clark-Wilson, A., Robutti, O., & Thomas, M. (2020). Teaching with digital technology. ZDM, 1–20.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
Dumitru, C., Radovici, M. C. M., Rasiti, G., & Veselinović, L. (2023). Science and Learning in the Digital Era. Der Donauraum, 63(1–2), 83–98.
European Commission. (2020b). Shaping Europe’s digital future. Retrieved from [https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/communincation-shaping-europes-digital-future_en].
European Commission. (2020d). White Paper on Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved from [https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/white-paper-artificial-intelligence-european-approach-excellence-and-trust_en].
European University Association. (2019). EUA Trends 2019: Learning and Teaching in the European Higher Education Area. Retrieved from [https://eua.eu/resources/publications/871:eua-trends-2019-learning-and-teaching-in-the-european-higher-education-area.html].
European University Association. (2021). Policy Brief on Digital Education Transformation in European Universities. Retrieved from [https://eua.eu/resources/publications/1144:policy-brief-on-digital-education-transformation-in-european-universities.html].
Ezugwu, A. E., Ofem, P. O., Rathod, P., Agushaka, J. O., & Haruna, S. (2016). An empirical evaluation of the role of information and communication Technology in Advancement of teaching and learning. Procedia Computer Science, 92, 568-577.
Floridi, L. (2015). The onlife manifesto: Being human in a hyperconnected era. Springer Nature.
Garrison, D. R. (2017). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. Routledge.
Järvelä, S., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013). New frontiers: Regulating learning in CSCL. Routledge.
Jassim, L. L. (2022). Using E-learning technologies in teaching and learning process. International Journal of Social Learning (IJSL), 1(1), 15–23.
Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 215–239). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kohlberg, L. (1984). The psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages. Harper & Row.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2014). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press.
Monteiro, A., & Leite, C. (2021). Digital literacies in higher education: Skills, uses, opportunities and obstacles to digital transformation. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), 21(65).
Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2007). Building online learning communities: Effective strategies for the virtual classroom (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Punie, Y., editor(s), Redecker, C., European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu, EUR 28775 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2017, ISBN 978-92-79-73718-3 (print), 978-92-79-73494-6 (pdf), doi:10.2760/178382 (print), 10.2760/159770 (online), JRC107466.
Rathod, P., & Kämppi, P. (2021). Empower Competencies for Online Learning in Higher Education: An European Union Innovation under European Commission Project (ECOLHE), Report.
Remillard, J. T., Van Steenbrugge, H., Machalow, R., Koljonen, T., Krzywacki, H., Condon, L., & Hemmi, K. (2021). Elementary teachers’ reflections on their use of digital instructional resources in four educational contexts: Belgium, Finland, Sweden, and US. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 53(6), 1331–1345.
Rovai, A. P. (2004). A constructivist approach to online college learning. Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 79-93.
Siemens, G. (2014). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3-10.
Siemens, G., & Tittenberger, P. (2009). Handbook of emerging technologies for learning. University of Manitoba.
Treffinger, D. J. (2000). Problem-based learning: A learning model for the 21st century. Gifted Education International, 15(1), 86–88.
Voinea, C. L., & Roijakkers, N. (2023). Educating for the Future. In Futurology in Education and Learning (pp. 1-4).
Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S. and Punie, Y., DigComp 2.2: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens - With new examples of knowledge, skills and attitudes, EUR 31006 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2022, ISBN 978-92- 76-48883-5, doi:10.2760/490274, JRC128415.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Winters, F., Smit, R., & Pearson, M. (2008). Information and communication technology in education: A curriculum for schools and programme of teacher development. Commonwealth of Learning.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3-17.
Downloads
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2023 Quaderni di comunità
Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 4.0 Internazionale.
