30 anni da Dayton: pace, potere e la politica della Bosnia-Erzegovina del dopoguerra
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61007/QdC.2026.2.448Parole chiave:
Dayton, Europa post guerra fredda, Bosnia ed Erzegovina, Jugoslavia, guerre jugoslaveAbstract
Trent’anni dopo la firma degli Accordi di Dayton, la Bosnia ed Erzegovina rimane un caso complesso di ricostruzione post-conflitto ed evoluzione istituzionale. Questo saggio rivisita il significato storico di Dayton, evidenziandone il ruolo nel fermare la violenza e nell’avviare la pace. Esamina i punti di forza strutturali dell’accordo e le sue limitazioni perduranti, in particolare il suo quadro etno-politico e le implicazioni per la governance democratica. Vengono esplorate le prospettive di tutti i popoli costituenti e degli altri cittadini della Bosnia ed Erzegovina, unitamente al ruolo evolutivo della comunità internazionale nella costruzione dello Stato e nelle riforme. Vengono dedicate particolare attenzione alle sfide dello sviluppo istituzionale, dell’inclusione civica e della riconciliazione. Tracciando la traiettoria dalla cessazione delle ostilità alla statualità contestata, il saggio offre una riflessione sull’eredità di Dayton, sulla sua rilevanza futura e sulle prospettive accademiche correnti.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Bieber, F. (2006). Post-war Bosnia: Ethnicity, inequality and public sector governance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bojičić-Dželilović, V., & Čaušević, F. (2025). Post-war reconstruction in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Rome: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
Chollet, D. (2005). The road to the Dayton Accords: A study of American statecraft. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Malcolm, N. (1994). Bosnia: A short history. London: Macmillan.
Silber, L., & Little, A. (1997). Yugoslavia: Death of a nation (Rev. ed.). London: Penguin Books.
Journal Articles
Fazlić, F. (2020). Twenty five years of the Dayton Agreement: Peace project or difficult journey towards a functional state. SEER Journal for Labour and Social Affairs in Eastern Europe, 23(2), 165–186. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG.
Grbavac, V., Pepić, I., & Zdeb, A. (2026). Dayton at 30: Unpacking the politics of power-sharing. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 32(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537113.2026.2622180.
Kapidzic, D., Piacentini, A., & Husremović, D. (2025). Stuck in the past: Bosnia and Herzegovina’s enduring struggle with a fractured legacy. Southeastern Europe, 48(2), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.30965/18763332-48020001 (doi.org in Bing).
Reports & Research Notes
Ball, P., Tabeau, E., & Verwimp, P. (2007). The Bosnian book of the dead: Assessment of the database (Full report). HiCN Research Design Note 5. Households in Conflict Network. https://www.unhcr.org/sites/default/files/legacy-pdf/3ae6a0c58.pdf.
Ker-Lindsay, J. (n.d.). The hollow threat of secession in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Legal and political impediments to a unilateral declaration of independence by Republika Srpska. LSEE – Research on South Eastern Europe, London School of Economics. https://www.lse.ac.uk/LSEE-Research-on-South-Eastern-Europe/Assets/Documents/Publications/Paper-Series-on-SEE/KerLindsay-Hollow-Threat-of-Secession-in-BiH.pdf.
Korkut, H., & Mulalić, M. (n.d.). Implications of Dayton Peace Agreement on current political issues in Bosnia-Herzegovina. International University of Sarajevo. DergiPark. https://dergipark. org.tr/tr/download/article-file/117964.
Institutional & Government Sources
Parliamentary Assembly of Bosnia and Herzegovina. (2010). Publication. https://www.parlament.ba/Publication/Read/3594?title=parliamentary-assembly-of-bosnia-and-herzegovina&pageId=239.
Office of the High Representative. (n.d.). High Representative’s decision on the establishment of the Brčko District of Bosnia and Herzegovina. https://www.ohr.int/ohr_archive/high-representatives-decision-on-the-establishment-of-the-brcko-district-of-bosnia-and-herzegovina/.
Office of the High Representative. (n.d.). Decisions of the High Representative. https://www.ohr.int/decisions-of-the-high-representative/.
Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina. (n.d.). Constitutional position. https://www.ustavnisud.ba/en/constitutional-position.
Regional Cooperation Council. (n.d.). About us. https://www.rcc.int/pages/2/about-us.
Online Sources
EUFOR Bosnia and Herzegovina. (n.d.). Background. https://www.euforbih.org/index.php/en/background.
Pasić, A. (2015). Bosnia and Herzegovina: Ethnic divisions and displacement. Forced Migration Review. https://www.fmreview.org/dayton20/pasic.
Transparency International. (n.d.). Bosnia and Herzegovina. https://www.transparency.org/en/countries/bosnia-and-herzegovina.
United Nations. (2024). Security Council press release SC/15696. https://press.un.org/en/2024/sc15696.doc.htm.
University of Sarajevo. (2026). International conference: Bosnia and Herzegovina – 25 years of Dayton Peace Agreement. https://www.unsa.ba/en/novosti/international-conference-bosnia-and-herzegovina-25-years-dayton-peace-agreement.
University of Sarajevo. (2026). 30 years of Dayton Agreement. https://30godina.unsa.ba/#about-us-eng.
CE Report. (2026). European Union news. https://www.cereport.eu/news/european-union/88370.
YouTube. (2026). Video on Bosnia and Herzegovina. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfyKhyhrhCM.
Downloads
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2026 Quaderni di comunità. Persone, Educazione e Welfare nella società 5.0
Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 4.0 Internazionale.
