Towards a high-quality apprenticeship system: European standards, decent work and multi-level governance. The case of the Tuscany Region
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61007/QdC.2026.1.400Keywords:
apprenticeship, quality, governance, skills, Decent workAbstract
In recent years, the quality of apprenticeships has become a central theme in the construction of vocational education and training systems capable of responding coherently to changes in the labour market and promoting decent employment conditions. The Recommendation of the Council of the European Union on a European Framework for Quality and Effective Apprenticeships (2018) defined fourteen benchmarks aimed at ensuring common standards for learning and work, recognising quality as a prerequisite for the relevance and effectiveness of dual pathways. In a complementary perspective, the International Labour Organisation’s Recommendation on quality apprenticeships has expanded the European concept of quality to include the dimension of decent work, with particular attention to the rights of non-discrimination, health and safety and fair remuneration of apprentices. Quality, therefore, cannot be reduced to a mere verification of conformity, but is configured as systemic coherence between training objectives, contents, methodologies and learning outcomes. The contribution, developed as a conceptual and governance analysis based on a regional case, interprets quality as a multi-level coordination lever capable of harmonising apprenticeship policies and practices between the different institutional levels, strengthening transparency, mutual trust and continuous improvement. Within the framework of European (EQAVET and Recommendation 2018) and international (ILO Recommendation 208/2023) references, the article analyses the case of the Tuscany Region, which, in 2023, approved its Apprenticeship Quality Charter (DGR 1165/2023). This tool, conceived as an operational framework for the design, monitoring and evaluation of pathways, aims to strengthen coherence between actors and systems, promoting organisational learning and co-responsibility between training institutions, businesses and social partners.
References
Brockmann, M., & Smith, R. (2023). ‘Invested’ partnerships as key to high quality apprenticeship programmes as evidenced in on- and off-the-job training. Journal of Education and Work, 36(3), 220–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2023.2174958.
Cedefop. (2021a). Apprenticeship governance and in-company training: Where labour market and education meet (Cedefop Working Paper Series, No. 3). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2801/065622.
Cedefop. (2021b). EFQEA implementation: A Cedefop analysis and main findings. How schemes in Cedefop’s European database on apprenticeship schemes compare with EFQEA criteria. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2801/563247.
Consiglio dell’Unione europea. (2018). Raccomandazione del Consiglio del 15 marzo 2018 relativa a un quadro europeo per apprendistati efficaci e di qualità (2018/C 153/01). Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea, C 153, 2.4.2018.
D’Agostino, S., & Vaccaro, S. (2019). Apprendistato e qualità: un binomio possibile? Scuola democratica, Learning for Democracy, (2), 431–444. https://doi.org/10.12828/94826.
Infante, V., & Vaccaro, S. (a cura di). (2024). Segnali di potenziamento dell’apprendistato duale: XXII Rapporto di monitoraggio. Roma: INAPP. Retrieved from https://oa.inapp.gov.it/handle/20.500.12916/4512.
Interreg Europe. (n.d.). QUEEN – Quality Apprenticeships for Evolving Labour Needs. Retrieved 29 December 2025 from https://www.interregeurope.eu/queen.
International Labour Organization (ILO). (2023). Quality Apprenticeships Recommendation, 2023 (No. 208). Geneva: ILO.
International Labour Organization (ILO). (2024). Making quality apprenticeships work: A guide for policy makers. Geneva: ILO. ISBN 978-92-2-041185-8.
McCann, D., & Stewart, A. (2024). Quality, formality and the evolution of international labour law: The new ILO quality apprenticeships standard. Industrial Law Journal, 53(4), 638–678. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwae012.
OECD. (2018). Seven Questions about Apprenticeships: Answers from International Experience. OECD Reviews of Vocational Education and Training. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264306486-en.
OECD. (2022). Engaging employers in quality apprenticeships: Making it happen locally. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/6725cbbc-en.
Regione Toscana. (2023a). Carta di qualità degli apprendistati realizzati in Toscana. Deliberazione della Giunta regionale n. 1165 del 9 ottobre 2023. Pubblicata sul Bollettino Ufficiale della Regione Toscana (BURT), n. 42 del 18 ottobre 2023.
Regione Toscana. (2023b). Accordo di collaborazione tra Regione Toscana e Camera di Commercio Italo-Germanica per la promozione della qualità dell’apprendistato. Deliberazione della Giunta regionale n. 1400 del 27 novembre 2023. Pubblicata sul Bollettino Ufficiale della Regione Toscana (BURT), n. 49 del 6 dicembre 2023.
Romito, A. (a cura di). (2023). Modelli e prassi di apprendistato formativo a confronto. Studi di caso in Italia ed Europa (INAPP Report n. 37). Roma: INAPP. Retrieved from https://oa.inapp.gov.it/handle/20.500.12916/3953.
Smith, E. (2023). Apprenticeships: The problem of attractiveness and the hindrance of heterogeneity. International Journal of Training and Development, 27(1), 18–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12281.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Community Notebook. People, Education and Welfare in the Society 5.0

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.




