Models of participatory governance in universities that institutionalize youth co-decision-making: the case of the Euonair student board
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61007/QdC.2026.3.459Keywords:
participatory governance, youth co-decision-making, European University Alliances, Student Board, higher education governanceAbstract
Higher education policy increasingly emphasises youth empowerment, yet governance arrangements enabling structured student co-decision-making remain rare. This study addresses the gap between symbolic representation and substantive co-governance through a case study of the EUonAIR European University Alliance, a sui generis consortium of ten institutions across eight European countries. Using institutional analysis, it examines how youth co-decision-making is operationalised across three dimensions: the formal governance framework, student agency in practice, and informal governance practices. Findings suggest that effective co-decision-making depends on formal integration within governance structures, clearly defined rotation protocols, and a dual-track model combining formal decision-making with high-frequency informal coordination. The study assesses the scalability of this model for other European University alliances and highlights the challenge of sustaining student engagement beyond the initial project cycle.
References
Alhamad, B., & Hayat, K. (2025). Governance Models for Student Involvement in Higher Education: A Comparative Analysis. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 9(3), 8134–8150.
Amponsah, P. (2025). Shared Governance and Social Capital Theory: A Qualitative Study of Perceptions and Outcomes. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 9(8), 1364–1380.
Carey, P. (2015). The impact of institutional culture, policy and process on student engagement in university decision-making. Liverpool John Moores University.
CODESRIA. (n.d.). The Governance of Higher Education. In The Status of Student Involvement in University Governance in Kenya (pp. 37–77).
Deem, R., & Magalhães, A. (n.d.). University governance reforms in European Higher Education: external governing board stakeholders in Portugal and the UK. Paper 0244. ECER 2018, Alberto Amaral and António Magalhães. In Handbook on Higher Education Management and Governance; https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollbook/book/9781800888074/9781800888074.xml; pp. 401- 416
European Students’ Union (ESU). (2018). Student participation in Higher Education Governance. In Bologna with Student Eyes 2018 (pp. 37–50). Brussels: ESU.
Klemenčič, M. (2024). The Key Concepts in the Study of Student Politics and Representation in Higher Education. In M. Klemenčič (Ed.), The Bloomsbury Handbook of Student Politics and Representation in Higher Education (pp. 7–38). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Régent, V., Régent, V., Avila, R., Aharonson-Daniel, L., Alt, D., Tarasenko, S., Vorontsova, A. (2025). Continuity and Accessibility in Higher Education Amid Armed Conflict. ZFHE, 20(4), 153–173.
Vulliamy, B. (2023). Five Simple Ways to Involve Students in University Governance and Decision Making with Impact. AHUA. https://www.ahua.ac.uk/opinion-post/5-simple-ways-to-involve-students-in-university-governance-and-decision-making-with-impact/; retrieved: 29 May 2026
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Community Notebook. People, Education and Welfare in the Society 5.0

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.




