Co-creating a new university model through participation and co-decision-making: the case of Sapienza University of Rome

Authors

  • Gianluca Senatore Sapienza University of Rome, Department of Political Science
  • Paolo Brescia University of Cagliari, Department of Political and Social Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61007/QdC.2026.3.460

Keywords:

university, governance, communication, co-creation, civic university, decision-making

Abstract

This paper develops a sociological interpretation of the participatory governance practices that emerged at Sapienza University of Rome during the COVID-19 emergency between 2020 and 2022. Rather than treating student participation as a merely consultative or symbolic dimension of academic life, the article argues that the case of Sapienza suggests a more demanding analytical possibility: under specific organisational conditions, elected student representatives can become mediating actors in institutional governance, contributing to organisational listening, information circulation, trust-building and adaptive co-decision-making. The paper is designed as an exploratory qualitative case study and interprets the case through scholarship on the civic university, student representation, co-production, collaborative governance, public value, organisational sensemaking and trust in expert systems. The central contribution is the notion of student-mediated institutional governance, understood not as a fully generalised model but as an interpretive construct generated from the case. It describes a configuration in which student representation operates as a relational infrastructure that reduces informational asymmetries between students and universities and supports institutional learning in such a complex organisation.

References

Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.

Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C. & Bloomberg, L. L. (2014). Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445-456.

Crozier, M. & Friedberg, E. (1980). Actors and systems: The politics of collective action. University of Chicago Press.

de Boer, H., Enders, J., & Schimank, U. (2007). On the way towards new public management? The governance of university systems in England, the Netherlands, Austria, and Germany. In D. Jansen (Ed.), New forms of governance in research organisations: Disciplinary approaches, interfaces and integration (pp. 137-152). Springer.

Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and Mode 2 to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123.

Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford University Press.

Goddard, J., Hazelkorn, E., Kempton, L., Vallance, P. (Eds.). (2016). The civic university: The policy and leadership challenges. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

March, J. G., Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. Hoboken: Wiley.

Matthews, K. E., & Dollinger, M. (2023). Student voice in higher education: The importance of distinguishing student representation and student partnership. Higher Education, 85(3), 555-570.

Marginson, S. (2011). Higher education and public good. Higher Education Quarterly, 65(4), 411-433.

Tight, M. (2018). Higher education for public value: Taking the debate beyond New Public Management. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(2), 307-318.

Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. London: SAGE.

Published

2026-10-20

How to Cite

Senatore, G., & Brescia, P. (2026). Co-creating a new university model through participation and co-decision-making: the case of Sapienza University of Rome. Community Notebook. People, Education and Welfare in the Society 5.0, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.61007/QdC.2026.3.460